PHMSA Issues NOPR for Gas Distribution Integrity Management Programs (DIMP)

PHMSA has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) that will require operators of gas distribution pipelines to develop and implement integrity management programs. PHMSA is requesting comments be submitted by September 23, 2008. As proposed, a gas distribution pipeline operator will have 18 months to develop and implement a written integrity management program once the final rule is published. Within Part 192, the NOPR creates a new Subpart P – Gas Distribution Pipeline Integrity Management and deletes §192.383 Excess Flow Valve Customer Notification. Some highlights of the NOPR are listed below:

  • Required elements within a DIMP
    • Knowledge of gas distribution system – utilization of historical deign and operational data as available and implement processes for capturing this data going forward.
    • Identification of threats – corrosion, natural forces, excavation damage, other outside force damage, material/weld failure, equipment malfunction, operations, and other as appropriate
    • Evaluate and prioritize risk – allows for threat evaluation of regions within the distribution system that have common characteristics across multiple mains, service lines, etc. carrying similar risks and actions necessary to reduce risks within the same region.
    • Identify and implement measures to address risks – implementation of leak management and enhanced damage prevention programs as well as evaluation of human error factors related to inappropriate operations.
    • Measure performance, monitor results, and evaluate effectiveness – establish a baseline and measure performance improvements against this in terms of leak mitigation, excavation damage reduction, installation of excess flow valves (EFV), and others as appropriate.
    • Periodic evaluation and improvement – establishes a maximum 5 year interval in which gas distribution operators must reevaluate its DIMP. The NOPR also requires operators to continually re-evaluate threats and risks and periodically evaluate human contributions to risk.
    • Reporting results – lists four measurements to be included on the operator’s annual report (number of hazardous leaks eliminated/repaired and their cause, number of excavation damages, number of one-call tickets, and number of EFV’s installed).
  • Requires gas distribution pipeline operators to report all material failures of plastic pipe within 90 days to PHMSA and appropriate state agency with jurisdiction.
  • Provides circumstances when EFV’s are required for new or replaced service lines.
  • Allows gas distribution operators to submit requests to PHMSA or the appropriate state agency for extending the frequency of inspections and tests required by Part 192 (e.g. leak survey, corrosion inspection, etc.) based upon engineering analysis and DIMP risk assessments.
  • Allows operators of master meter or LPG systems to implement simplified DIMP based upon the simplicity of these types of systems.

For a copy of the NOPR or for information on how RCP can support the development activities of a DIMP, please contact Jessica Roger.

PHMSA Advisory Bulletin (ADB-08-05) – Advance Notice of Biofuel Transportation

[Docket No. PHMSA-RSPA-2004-19856]

The Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (DOT/PHMSA) issued Advisory Bulletin ADB-08-05 requesting voluntary advance notification of intent to transport biofuels and field testing. On August 10, 2007, PHMSA published a Federal Register document (72 FR 45002) on the applicability of the pipeline safety regulations to the transportation of ethanol and biofuels by pipeline. PHMSA noted the technical issues associated with transporting biofuels by pipeline including internal corrosion and stress corrosion cracking, and the performance of seals, gaskets and internal coatings. Please reference RCP’s newsletter article in the September 2007 edition of DOT Pipeline Compliance News.

Operators intending to transport these new fuels are expected to conduct risk analysis, monitoring, and controls as needed to move biofuels safely, as well as conduct spill response planning for the new product. PHMSA seeks to work with pipeline operators that plan to transport these new fuels in existing regulated hazardous liquid pipelines or in new pipelines that might be constructed for the purpose of transporting ethanol or biofuels. PHMSA is requesting operators to provide advance notice of their intent to transport these fuels to facilitate cooperation in achieving safety.

PHMSA encourages field testing by pipeline operators to accelerate the development of knowledge about the safe and reliable transportation of ethanol and biofuels by pipeline. They are requesting that any operator intending to field test transportation of biofuels by pipeline provide advance notification to PHMSA so that PHMSA can work with the operator to address any safety concerns that arise.

Under 49 CFR 195, an operator is obligated to modify its operating procedures, integrity management programs, and emergency response plans, etc., prior to commencing commercial transportation of a new hazardous liquid. Operators must also update their spill response plans to account for the new product being transported. PHMSA requests that operators intending to commence regular commercial transportation of ethanol or other biofuels provide a 60-day advance notice to PHMSA.

Submit notifications in writing to: Information Resources Manager, OPS/PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590, by fax to 202-366-7128, or by e-mail to informationresourcesmanager@phmsa.dot.gov. Include name, title, telephone number, and e-mail address of the person responsible for compliance with the integrity management requirements and a physical description of facilities involved including pipe design, manufacture, vintage, diameter, relevant operating history, and presence of any breakout tanks along with project timelines.

PHMSA will review all notifications received. Review may include site inspections by PHMSA or state pipeline safety agencies, particularly in states with certified hazardous liquid programs. If PHMSA finds that an operator’s plans and operating procedures need additional attention or modification, they will provide feedback to the operator.

For a copy of ADB-08-05, contact Jessica Roger.

PHMSA Advisory Bulletin (ABD-08-06) Dynamic Riser Inspection, Maintenance, and Monitoring Records on Offshore Floating Facilities

[Docket ID PHMSA-2008-0162]

PHMSA advises operators of hazardous liquid and natural gas pipelines with dynamic risers, such as steel catenary risers on offshore floating production facilities, to perform regular inspection and maintenance of these risers, monitor nearby environmental conditions, and maintain records of these activities. Failure of a dynamic riser could significantly impact safety, the environment, and delivery of an important source of natural gas and petroleum products used in the United States. PHMSA strongly urges operators to perform the above-listed actions and any other actions needed to ensure the safe and reliable operation of these systems.

A recent natural gas leak from a steel catenary export riser in the Gulf of Mexico created significant and unexpected risk, as well as major supply disruption. Though a root cause analysis of this incident is not yet complete, visual inspection by divers has determined that the source of the leak was a flexible joint on the riser. In 2004, another offshore riser flexible joint failure resulted in a small oil spill. Subsequent preemptive visual inspections performed on other steel catenary riser flexible joints in the Gulf of Mexico discovered damage to the elastomeric seal area near the rotating ball and drove the replacement of four flexible joints. The flexible joint riser failures described above have created potential safety risks on floating production facilities, and have impacted delivery of energy supplies from the Gulf of Mexico.

The national consensus standard for dynamic risers, American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice 2RD, is currently under revision. The revised version will directly address concerns raised in this Advisory Bulletin by including guidance for integrity management of dynamic risers. PHMSA will consider adopting the revised standard into its regulations for both natural gas and hazardous liquid pipelines.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Komiskey at 202-366-3169, or by e-mail to Elizabeth.Komiskey@dot.gov.

Note: the Department of Interior / Minerals Management Service also issued a similar notice in their recent Safety Alert No. 264.

Cased Pipeline Integrity Assessments Workshop

[Docket ID PHMSA-2008-0161]

PHMSA is holding a Workshop on Cased Pipeline Integrity Assessments on July 15-16, 2008 at the Sheraton Gateway Suites Chicago O'Hare, 6501 North Manheim Road, Rosemont, IL 60018. The workshop will assist pipeline operators, trade associations, and others in addressing concerns with successfully using External Corrosion Direct Assessment integrity evaluation methods and use of other technologies to assess casings in High Consequence Areas. The goal of the workshop is to develop a list of potential solutions that can address issues with cased crossing inspections through usage of new technology, understanding of and/or changes to the regulations, updating of standards, operating practices and/or research. PHMSA will then analyze the list of potential solutions with stakeholders for consideration on which solutions can best address the issues.

The first day of the workshop will include:

  • A background of the regulatory integrity requirements,
  • Technical updates by both operators and service providers,
  • Overview of research of new technology, inspection issues and the current integrity inspection positions,
  • Status of the stakeholders represented followed by panels presenting and discussing current NACE standards,
  • Approaches and assessment methodologies being used for cased pipeline segments, and
  • Research completed or underway.

The second day of the workshop will include:

  • Breakout sessions on the above topics, followed by the group convening to talk about technical assessment successes,
  • New technology,
  • New integrity assessment approaches,
  • Status update of assessments, and
  • Long term issues.

The second day will also serve as a brainstorm session for identifying discussion topics/issues that should be incorporated into a future public workshop on the broader issue of how pipeline industry can work collaboratively with others to reduce the need for casings on newly installed pipe.

Members of the public may attend this free workshop. To help with estimating attendance and planning for the breakout session, all attendees are encouraged to register for the workshop on the PHMSA Website. The workshop will be Web cast except for the breakout sessions on the second day. Information on the Web cast link, including estimates of times when the Web cast will be on, will be posted on the meeting Web site above. Presentations from the workshop and recommendations from the breakout sessions will be uploaded to the meeting Web site within 30 days after the workshop. The meeting Web site will have a list of technical documents participants are encouraged to review prior to the workshop, along with a list of questions and issues to be addressed during the workshop.

Hotel reservations under the U.S. Department of Transportation room block can be made at (847) 699-6300 by June 30. A daily rate of $168.00 is available. The meeting room(s) will be posted at the hotel on the days of the workshop. Hotel reservations must be made by contacting the hotel directly.

For further information contact: Max Kieba at (202) 493-0595, or by e-mail at max.kieba@dot.gov

TRRC Adopts Risk-Based Leak Survey Program

16 TAC Chapter 8 – Pipeline Safety Regulations

The Texas Railroad Commission (TRRC) adopted new §8.206, ‘Risk-Based Leak Survey Program’ effective September 1, 2008, for operators of gas distribution pipeline systems. The adopted rules require Texas gas distribution companies to establish a risk-based schedule of increased leak inspections; standardize leak grading and repair time frames; and repair or remove and replace certain compression couplings due to leaks or serviceability. No later than March 1, 2009, each operator shall have completed and submitted to TRRC either a prescriptive or a risk-based program for leak surveys for its pipeline systems that complies with the requirements of this section.

When establishing a risk-based schedule, pipeline operators are required to:

  • create a risk model on which to base its leak survey program to identify those systems or segments within systems that pose the greatest hazard and thus will be inspected for leaks more frequently
  • re-evaluate and update its leak survey inspection program to address any changes that may be identified through the monitoring of the pipeline system in accordance with the requirements imposed by 49 CFR 192.613 (relating to Continuing Surveillance)

The determination of leak survey frequency is determined by classifying each pipeline segment based on its degree of hazard associated with each risk factor; i.e., pipe location; age of the pipe and nature of the piping system; corrosion history; environmental factors, etc. Surveys should be conducted more frequently in those areas with the greatest potential where leakage could be expected to create a hazard. Operators must establish their own risk ranking for pipeline segments to determine the frequency of leakage surveys. The inspection interval may range from quarterly to every 5 years.

Operators electing to use a prescriptive leak survey program must conduct annual leak surveys for all systems within a business district; every 5 years for non-business district polyethylene segments; every 3 years for all other non-business district cathodically protected steel segments; and every 2 years for all other non-business district segments.

Each operator must ensure that its leak detection equipment is properly calibrated and that leak grading is made only by those individuals who possess training, experience, and knowledge in the field of leak classification and investigation, including extensive association with actual leakage work. Operators must comply with the requirements of new §8.207 for all leaks reported on or after September 1, 2008. Leaks identified prior to September 1, 2008 require repairs by the dates in the table below:

Type Identified Prior to: Repair Date Grade 2 September 1, 2008 March 1, 2009 Grade 3 September 1, 2008 September 1, 2011

  • Grade 1 leaks are defined as an existing or probable hazard to persons or property and requires the operator to take immediate action to eliminate the hazard and make repairs.
  • Grade 2 leaks are non-hazardous at the time of detection and can be scheduled for repair on a normal routine basis with periodic reinspection at least once every 30 days until the leak is repaired or cleared. Grade 2 leaks vary greatly in degree of potential hazard and may require a scheduled repair within the next 5 working days and others within 30 days. This new section outlines additional criteria that require repairs made within 6 months of detection of any leak.
  • Grade 3 leaks are non-hazardous at the time of detection and can be reasonably expected to remain non-hazardous. Operators must repair a Grade 3 leak within 36 months of detection.
  • There is a concise reference table for leak grading and leak repair deadlines in §8.207(g).

Section 8.208 pertains to the mandatory removal and replacement program of leaks identified on compression couplings that join both steel and plastic pipe, with an effective dated of September 1, 2008.

  • For leaks identified on any underground compression coupling used to mechanically join steel pipe, operators must either replace the leaking compression coupling or repair it using a sleeve welded over the compression coupling.
  • Operators are required to repair or replace any compression coupling used to mechanically join steel pipe that is exposed during operation and maintenance activities unless the operator can determine the coupling was installed after 1980.
  • For leaks identified on any underground compression coupling used to mechanically join plastic pipe, operators must remove and/or replace the leaking compression coupling.
  • For any other compression coupling used to join plastic pipe that is exposed during operation and maintenance activities (2-inches or less in diameter) operators must replace or remove coupling unless the operator can determine that the coupling is designated as an ASTM D2513 Category 1 type fitting. For plastic pipe greater than 2-inches in diameter, operators must replace or removed coupling unless the operator can determine that the coupling is designated as an ASTM D2513 Category 1 or Category 3 type fitting.

For more information, or a copy of the new rule, contact Jessica Roger.

Has the Gas Gathering definition affected your pipelines?

RCP can conduct a detailed analysis of your gas pipelines to determine end points of production and gathering based upon the recently finalized definition of gas gathering pipelines. The analysis will also determine whether your gathering pipelines are regulated and whether they are classified as Type A or B regulated gas gathering. For more information, click here to contact Jessica Roger.

Colorado Proposed Modifications to Pipeline Safety Regulations

The Colorado Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding amendments to the rules relating to the gas pipeline safety program, 4 Code of Colorado Regulations (CCR) 723-4, and also amends the existing state pipeline safety rules by adopting federal amendments up to October 1, 2007. The purpose of the proposed rules is to bring the Gas Pipeline Safety Rules up to date and in compliance with amended safety rules promulgated by the U.S. Department of Transportation, 49 U.S.C. § 60105 et seq.

The CPUC will conduct a hearing on these proposed rules before an Administrative Law Judge at 9 a.m. on August 18, 2008 at the CPUC Hearing Room 1560 Broadway, Suite 250 Denver, Colorado. Interested persons may submit written comments on the rules, including data, views, or arguments and present these orally at the hearing unless the Commission deems oral presentations unnecessary. Suggestions for changes that will make the subject rules more efficient, rational, or meaningful are also encouraged.

Submit written comments both in paper and electronic format no later than August 1, 2008. Reply comments should be submitted by August 11, 2008.

RCP Participation at the International Pipeline Conference 2008

RCP will be presenting three papers at the International Pipeline Conference in Calgary. Presenting authors from RCP include: Bill Byrd, P.E.; Larry Decker, P.E., and Ken Palmer, PhD. Starting with this month’s newsletter, we are providing an abstract of each paper — hopefully you will join us in Calgary for the full presentations.

Abstract: Transfers of Ownership: The Devil is in the Details

Ken Palmer, Lead Author and Bill Byrd, Co-Author

During the lifespan of a pipeline, it will most likely undergo several generations of acquisition, divestiture and other company transitions. This poster session begins with an overview of what is involved in a company name change, and includes a detailed presentation of the steps required for name change completion. Topics covered in this progression include: inventorying, agencies to contact, company personnel to be interviewed, forms to complete, required fees, required signatures and report preparation. Methodology is presented in a strategically designed format that allows one to complete this process in a timely and efficient manner. Information in this presentation will make one realize that a name change goes far beyond the relettering of company signs.

International Pipeline Conference 2008

Pipeline industry professionals from around the world will gather for the 7th International Pipeline Conference (IPC) on September 29 – October 3, 2008 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada at the TELUS Convention Centre and Hyatt Regency Hotel. Organized by volunteers representing international E&P;, transmission, and distribution corporations, energy and pipeline associations and governments, the IPC has become internationally renowned as the world’s premier pipeline conference. Visit the IPC website for more information.

RCP Hideout at the IPC Conference

If you are planning to attend the International Pipeline Conference in Calgary (September 29 – October 3) ask Donna for directions to the RCP Hideout. We’ll be hosting a two-day competition with the Nintendo Wiis®. Drop by for food, drinks, and some friendly competition. Practice your electronic tennis, bowling, and baseball skills. Win a Wii®! Your family will love you for it!

TEEX Pipeline Training Facility / Emergency Responders

The Texas Engineering Extension Service (TEEX) is world renowned for its hands-on customized training — providing training and technical assistance to more than 204,000 workers last year. This year, TEEX is building a pipeline prop at their facility which will benefit the industry in training emergency responders. It will be fully functional for training on both gas and liquid pipelines. Phase I is complete which includes 6 stand alone props and 2,300 ft. of underground pipeline. Phase II features a Chemical Complex which will tie into the pipeline prop. Once completed, this complex will enable TEEX to continue to remain the flagship for training in the pipeline emergency response field.

For more information regarding TEEX and how you can make a monetary or equipment donation to the "Chemical Complex Program" please contact: Kevin McMaughan at (979) 458-0171, or by email: james.mcmaughan@teexmail.tamu.edu.

Save the Dates!

RCP DOT Workshops in 2008

November 4 & 5 — Houston, Texas

Registration begins in August!!

Visit our Seminars webpage for updates & registration information.

Online Version of Pipeline Emergencies Training

Thanks to the CATS Connection newsletter for the following notice:

The National Association of State Fire Marshals (NASFM) has created an on-line version of Pipeline Emergencies to provide first responders with a general awareness of pipeline safety. Pipeline operations and commodity properties are highlighted in this summary of the full Pipeline Emergencies training program. In order to quantify the reach of Pipeline Emergencies 101, first responders are required to register on the web site before starting the training. NASFM and PHMSA encourage pipeline operators to include the link to Pipeline Emergencies 101 in pipeline safety awareness messages to first responders.

2008 International Pipeline Security Forum

The International Pipeline Security Forum (IPSF) will be held in Salt Lake City, UT at the Hilton Salt Lake City Center Hotel on October 29 & 30, 2008. The Forum is sponsored by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in collaboration with Natural Resources Canada. Registration and attendance at the forum is limited to pipeline, energy and security representatives and officials from private industry and government. This event is not open to the general public and media. IPSF Registration is free and hotel reservations can be made directly with the Hilton Salt Lake City Center Hotel no later than Sunday, September 28, 2008 for the discounted room rate.

Forum registration procedures and hotel reservation information can be found at the TSA Website.

The Forum agenda is currently being developed. Click here for the Draft Agenda.

Need A Security Plan or Audit?

We have the expertise to develop a security plan and perform risk assessments for pipeline and terminal facilities to meet recent DOT Hazmat Transportation & Pipeline regulations. We can also assist you in USCG security plans for dock facilities and vessels. Please contact Jessica Roger for more information.

Ongoing Resources

These articles are maintained and updated as new information becomes available.

Last Updated: October 2026

Regulatory Watch: Key Dates & Deadlines

Welcome to Regulatory Watch! In this monthly update, we’ll keep you informed on proposed rule comment periods, effective dates, and upcoming deadlines for various compliance requirements.

2137-AF63Proposed Rule Stage

Administrative Rulemaking Regulatory Procedures

Proposed
Final
Implementation
Regulatory WatchImplementation Stage

All Liquid HCA segments capable of ILI § 195.452(n)

Proposed
Final
ImplementationJul 2, 2040
2137-AF45Proposed Rule Stage

Amendments to Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities

Proposed
Final
Implementation
2137-AF61Final Rule Stage

Cost Recovery for Siting Reviews for LNG Facilities

Proposed
Final
Implementation
2137-AF51Final Rule Stage

Gas Pipeline Leak Detection and Repair

Proposed
Final
Implementation
Regulatory WatchImplementation Stage

Gas Transmission: Assessments Outside HCAs § 192.710

Proposed
Final
ImplementationJul 1, 2034
2137-AF37Proposed Rule Stage

Oil Spill Response Plans, Accident Notifications, Inspections and Investigations and other Miscellaneous Pipeline Safety Changes

Proposed
Final
Implementation
2137-AF52Proposed Rule Stage

Pipeline Operational Status

Proposed
Final
Implementation
2137-AF44Proposed Rule Stage

Repair Criteria for Gas and Hazardous Liquid Pipelines

Proposed
Public comments ClosedCloses Sep 8, 2026
Final
Implementation
2137-AF60Proposed Rule Stage

Safety of Carbon Dioxide and Hazardous Liquid Pipelines

Proposed
Final
Implementation
2137-AF53Final Rule Stage

Safety of Gas Distribution Pipelines and Other Pipeline Safety Initiatives

Proposed
Final
Implementation

Sprint I & II Update

To further the Administration’s deregulatory policies, PHMSA has published in today’s Federal Register twenty-eight (28) separate rulemaking actions affecting the pipeline safety regulations (PSR; Parts 190-199). Click here to access the documents.

Rulemaking Description Stage Code
Pipeline Safety: Rationalize Special Permit Conditions PHMSA proposes to amend its special permit procedures to ensure permit conditions are directly tied to the specific pipeline safety regulations being waived. NPRM 49 CFR Part 190
Pipeline Safety: Rationalize Calculation of Regulatory Filing and Compliance Deadlines PHMSA will clarify that regulatory filing and compliance deadlines falling on weekends or Federal holidays automatically move to the next business day. DFR 49 CFR Part 190
Pipeline Safety: Adjust Annual Report Filing Timelines PHMSA will amend annual reporting requirements to move the gas pipeline annual report submission deadline from March to June. DFR 49 CFR Part 191
Pipeline Safety: Property Damage Definition for Incident Reporting PHMSA will clarify incident reporting property damage calculations for gas pipelines and update hazardous liquid accident reporting thresholds using inflation-adjusted criteria. DFR 49 CFR Parts 191 & 195
Pipeline Safety: Exception for In-Plant Piping Systems PHMSA proposes to clarify that in-plant piping systems are not subject to federal pipeline safety regulations. NPRM 49 CFR Part 192
Pipeline Safety: Codify Enforcement Discretion on Incidental Gathering Lines PHMSA proposes to codify enforcement discretion clarifying that restrictions on the historical incidental gathering line exemption apply only to newly constructed lines. NPRM 49 CFR Part 192
Pipeline Safety: Eliminate Burdensome Coating Assessment Deadlines PHMSA proposes to replace prescriptive deadlines for coating damage assessments and remediation with a requirement that activities be completed before the pipeline is placed in service. NPRM 49 CFR Part 192
Pipeline Safety: Atmospheric Corrosion Reassessment for Pipeline Replacements PHMSA proposes to remove the 3-year reassessment interval following replacement of atmospheric corrosion defects and allow use of the standard 5-year reassessment interval. NPRM 49 CFR Part 192
Pipeline Safety: Harmonize Class Change Pressure Test Requirements PHMSA proposes to reduce the minimum pressure test duration following certain class location changes from 8 hours to 4 hours, aligning with existing Subpart J requirements. NPRM 49 CFR Part 192
Pipeline Safety: Clarify MAOP Reconfirmation Testing Records PHMSA will issue a technical correction clarifying that operators may use pre-1970s pressure test records when reconfirming MAOP under §192.624. Final Rule 49 CFR Part 192
Pipeline Safety: Remote Sensing Technologies for ROW Patrols PHMSA will explicitly allow right-of-way patrols to be conducted using unmanned aircraft systems, satellites, and other remote sensing technologies. DFR 49 CFR Parts 192 & 195
Pipeline Safety: Technical Standards Updates and Amendments PHMSA will update incorporated standards and make technical amendments in response to an industry petition for reconsideration. Final Rule 49 CFR Part 192
Pipeline Safety Program: Update of Standards Incorporated by Reference PHMSA issued multiple direct final rules updating incorporated industry consensus standards used throughout Parts 192 and 195, replacing outdated editions with current versions. Multiple DFRs 49 CFR Parts 192 & 195

The following is a summary of the 40 rulemakings that PHMSA published in the Federal Register on April 24, 2026. If any adverse comment is received to a DFR PHMSA must rescind the rule and repropose. Click here to access the documents.

Rulemaking Description Stage Code
Pipeline Safety and Hazardous Materials Safety: Amendments to PHMSA Procedural Regulations PHMSA proposed miscellaneous amendments to procedural regulations governing informal rulemaking for both pipeline safety and hazardous materials programs. NPRM 49 CFR Part 190
Pipeline Safety: Interpretation Request Procedures PHMSA amended interpretation procedures to require publication of interpretation requests on its website and provide an opportunity for public comment. Final Rule 49 CFR Part 190
Pipeline Safety: Declaratory Order Procedures PHMSA established formal procedures for issuing declaratory orders through a new section in Part 190. Final Rule 49 CFR Part 190
Pipeline Safety: Consent Orders PHMSA clarified that consent agreements may be used to resolve enforcement actions, including cases involving civil penalties. Final Rule 49 CFR Part 190
Pipeline Safety: Adjustment to OPID Notifications for Construction PHMSA proposed adjusting the inflation-based threshold that triggers OPID notifications for certain construction and facility modification activities. NPRM 49 CFR Part 191
Pipeline Safety: Eliminating Limitations on Welders and Welding Operators PHMSA proposed allowing welders qualified through non-destructive testing methods to perform compressor station welding activities currently subject to additional restrictions. NPRM 49 CFR Part 192
Pipeline Safety: Material Properties Verification During MAOP Reconfirmation PHMSA proposed clarifying that material testing at pressure test manifold sites is not required when traceable, verifiable, and complete material records already exist. NPRM 49 CFR Part 192
Pipeline Safety: Electronic Retention of Part 194 Response Plans PHMSA amended regulations to allow operators to maintain electronic copies of response plans instead of paper copies. DFR 49 CFR Part 194
Pipeline Safety: Remote Monitoring of Rectifiers PHMSA proposed allowing remote monitoring technologies for rectifiers used in external corrosion control programs. NPRM 49 CFR Part 195
Pipeline Safety: Clarifying Hazardous Liquid High-Consequence Area Designations PHMSA amended HCA guidance to clarify spill considerations in agricultural fields and reorganize threat identification guidance. DFR 49 CFR Part 195
Pipeline Safety: Timeframe to Make Rupture-Mitigation Valves Operational PHMSA proposed extending the deadline for placing rupture-mitigation valves into operation from 14 days to 90 days after a pipeline enters service. NPRM 49 CFR Part 192
Pipeline Safety: Hazardous Liquid Valve Maintenance Schedule PHMSA proposed allowing operators to implement risk-based valve maintenance schedules, subject to a maximum inspection interval of one year. NPRM 49 CFR Part 195
Pipeline Safety: Property Damage Definition for Incident Reporting PHMSA proposes revising property damage thresholds for reportable gas and hazardous liquid pipeline incidents and clarifying applicability to telephonic notifications. NPRM 49 CFR Parts 192 & 195
Pipeline Safety: Remote Sensing Technologies for ROW Patrols PHMSA proposes clarifying that unmanned aerial systems, satellites, and other remote-sensing technologies may be used to satisfy right-of-way patrol requirements. NPRM 49 CFR Parts 192 & 195
Pipeline Safety: Adjust Annual Report and NPMS Filing Timelines PHMSA proposes extending annual report and NPMS submission deadlines for gas pipeline and storage operators to June 15 each year. NPRM 49 CFR Part 191
Pipeline Safety: Editorial Corrections and Clarifications PHMSA issued multiple final rules correcting editorial errors, updating references, removing obsolete submission methods, and improving regulatory clarity. Final Rules Various
Pipeline Safety: Update of Standards Incorporated by Reference PHMSA issued multiple direct final rules updating incorporated industry consensus standards, including NFPA, ASTM, MSS, NACE, and ASME standards. Multiple DFRs 49 CFR Parts 192 & 195

Have questions about an upcoming deadline? Please reach out to Jessica Foley for assistance!

Last Updated: October 2026

Conference News

Jan252027

Pipeline Pigging and Integrity Management Conference

▦ January 25, 2027 – January 28, 2027⌖ George R. Brown Convention Center, Houston, TX

The 39th International Pipeline Pigging & Integrity Management Conference (PPIM) will take place at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston. The event brings together pipeline operators, engineers, and industry professionals to explore advancements in pipeline inspection, integrity management, risk assessment, and emerging technologies.…

ExhibitingBooth 524
RCP Team Attending
Heather RoarkHeather RoarkSales & Marketing Coordinator
Jessica FoleyJessica FoleyVice President
Featured Presentations
Chris McLaren
Chris McLarenExecutive Consultant
October 27, 2026 at 7:30 AM
Event Details
Last Updated: October 2026

PSI Training Schedule

Date Training Course Price Registration
Nov 17 – Nov 19, 2026 DOT Pipeline Compliance Workshop $2,150 SOLD OUT
Feb 16 – Feb 18, 2027 Pipeline Safety Audit Training $2,150 Register →
Feb 23 – Feb 25, 2027 Advanced Pipeline Risk Assessment Workshop $2,150 Register →
Mar 23 – Mar 25, 2027 DOT Pipeline Compliance Workshop $2,150 Register →

WEBINAR RECORDING!
Unpacking the Key Updates in API RP 1170 & 1171, 2nd Edition

RCP and the Pipeline Safety Institute offered a free webinar exploring the 2nd Editions of API RP 1170, Design and Operation of Solution-mined Salt Caverns Used for Natural Gas Storage and API RP 1171, Functional Integrity of Natural Gas Storage in Depleted Hydrocarbon Reservoirs and Aquifer Reservoirs. Thank you to everyone who attended and participated in this informative webinar. The session recording is posted to our YouTube channel. Please watch, like, and subscribe to our channel!

WEBINAR RECORDING
Pipeline Safety: Unpacking the Class Location Change Requirements

Thank you to everyone who attended and participated in this informative webinar. The session recording is posted to our YouTube channel. Please watch, like, and subscribe to our channel!

You asked and we listened!

Advanced DOT Pipeline Compliance Workshop is on the calendar!

This intensive and interactive 3-day, in-person workshop is designed for those who have previously completed our DOT Pipeline Compliance Workshop and are ready to take their knowledge to the next level.

New Workshop Alert!

Prepare Your Team for Pipeline Safety Audits with Confidence!

Our 3-day Pipeline Safety Audit Workshop is tailored for professionals responsible for the safe operation of hazardous liquid and natural gas pipelines. Designed for groups of 10-15 participants, this interactive training…

On-Site Training Request

We have conducted on-site training for oil and gas companies for over 25 years and can provide customized workshops for companies with groups of five or more.

We would welcome the opportunity to discuss our services with you.

Sincerely,

W. R. (Bill) Byrd, PE
President
RCP Inc.