Letter on Breakout Tanks
Richard B. Felder/Stephen D. Luftig letter on Breakout Tanks:
On February 4, 2000, Mr. Richard Felder, Associate Administrator, Office of Pipeline Safety, United States Department of Transportation and Mr. Stephen D. Luftig, Director of Emergency and Remedial Response, United States Environmental Protection Agency sent a letter to the Department of Transportation, Office of Pipeline Safety Regional Directors concerning jurisdiction over breakout tanks/ bulk oil storage tanks (containers) at transportation-related and Non-transportation-related facilities.
This agreement clarifies these jurisdictional issues and establishes mutual goals for the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response and the Office of Pipeline Safety. However, the letter does not amend the 1971 MOU between the EPA and DOT or redelegate any responsibilities agreed to under that MOU or previously assigned to DOT or EPA under Executive Order 12777 or any previous Executive Order.
This letter and the attachments which show jurisdictional boundaries in different scenarios can be found on the RCP website at
Operator Qualification
Mr. Ken Vanover with ExxonMobil shared his opinion with us concerning last month's Covered Task item. He feels that placing and maintaining pipeline markers IS a covered task, because if the markers were not in place and someone accidentally dug into the line, it WOULD affect the integrity of the line. Certainly, these markers are very important safety devices, and their placement and maintenance should be considered a covered task. Do you agree?
And now for this month's item: Is installing pipe in a ditch a covered task?
- Is it performed on a pipeline facility? This is definitely performed in the pipeline right-of-way.
- Is it an Operations and Maintenance task? The answer to this question depends on when the pipe is being installed. If it is a new line that is being constructed, then the task would be construction and not maintenance. However, since repairs fall under maintenance activities and this task could very well represent a segment of pipe being replaced, it could very well be a covered task.
- Is it performed as a requirement of 49 CFR Part 192 or 195? This task is performed to comply with 49 CFR Parts 192.319 and 195.246
- Does it affect the operation or integrity of the pipeline? How the pipe is handled and covered when being installed in a ditch affects the pipeline integrity. The integrity is affected by the possibility of undue stress on the pipe from cover or hits from equipment.
What do you think about these questions? Please email your comments on this or other tasks that you would like to have included in future newsletters to tina@your-rcp.com.
Acquiring a pipeline?
RCP can provide due diligence audits to help you ensure that potential compliance issues have been addressed before the sale is final.
Upcoming Seminars
RCP is planning DOT seminars in May and October of 2000 in Houston, Texas. These seminars will include an "Introduction to the DOT Pipeline Regulations" seminar in May, and in October we will have a seminar specifically concerning DOT Pipeline Operator Qualification issues. Watch this newsletter or check our website for details.
Drug and Alcohol Meetings
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has scheduled three public listening sessions on its notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to revise the Department's drug and alcohol testing procedures, published in the Federal Register on December 9, 1999 (64 FR 69076). The meeting notice was published in the Federal Register on January 18, 2000 (65 FR 2573). The public meetings will be held on March 20 and 21, 2000, at the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004; on March 28, 2000, at the Hilton Los Angeles Airport, 5711 West Century Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90045, telephone number (310) 410-4000, fax (310) 410-6177; and on March 30, 2000, at the Crowne Plaza, Dallas Market Center, 7050 Stemmons Freeway, Dallas, TX 75247, telephone number (214) 630-8500, fax (214) 630-0037. The Washington DC meeting will include a roundtable discussion on the proposed public interest exclusion (PIE) provisions of the NPRM. For general meeting information and to register for one of the meetings, contact the DOT contractor, Marti Bludworth, Transportation Safety Institute (TSI), Special Programs Division, DTI-100, 4400 Will Rogers Parkway, Suite 205, Oklahoma City, OK 73108-2057, telephone number (800) 862-4832, extension 323, fax number (405) 946-4268, or e-mail marti_bludworth@tsi.jccbi.gov.
OPS Rulemakings: Current Status February 3, 2000
Click here to download a PDF Version of the DOT’s Regulatory Summary as of February 3, 2000
(Requires Adobe Acrobat to view)
Below you will find a brief summary of what the OPS is doing in the rulemaking arena. We will keep these updated as they change. Future months will not contain every docket, but will have news on those that change.
Further Regulatory Review; Gas Pipeline Safety Standards
In October 1997, National Association of Pipeline Safety Representatives (NAPSR) and the gas pipeline industry formed the State Industry Regulatory Review Committee (SIRRC), to discuss the regulatory proposals of NAPSR and other issues. On May 3, 1999, the SIRRC provided OPS a report on the outcome of the discussion on 39 proposed changes to the gas pipeline safety regulations. Most of the SIRRC recommendations will be addressed in a subsequent notice in Docket No. PS-124. The welding recommendations are being adopted in the periodic update (Docket No. RSPA-99-6016) which will be published by April 2000. The corrosion control recommendations are being considered in a review of the pipeline corrosion regulations in Docket No. RSPA-97-2762.
Passage of Internal Inspection Devices
On February 7, 1995 a Notice was published to suspend enforcement of the final rule (59 FR 17275; April 12, 1994) requirements that would require new and certain replacement pipelines be designed and constructed to accommodate the passage of instrumented internal inspection devices (“smart pigs”) for new and existing offshore gas transmission lines and for modifications to line segments based on partial replacement of pipe in existing onshore gas transmission lines. A final rule in response to the petitions, public comments, and recommendations from the advisory committee is being prepared for publication by April 2000.
Response Plans for Onshore Oil Pipeline
A public meeting on OPA matters was held in New Orleans, Louisiana on January 29, 1997, to solicit comments on the Interim Final Rule (58 FR 244; January 1, 1993) from pipeline industry, states and the public. A programmatic Environmental Assessment was published in Docket No. RSPA-99-6157 on August 30, 1999. A Notice of Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was published on October 26, 1999 (65 FR 57694). Final Action is likely in March, 2000.
Emergency Flow Restricting Devices (EFRD)
ERFDs are being considered as part of an NPRM in Docket No. RSPA-99-6355, Enhanced Safety and Environmental Protection for Gas Transmission and Hazardous Liquid Pipelines in High Consequence Areas. A NPRM is expected to be issued by April, 2000.
Increased Inspection Requirements
The need for increased inspection requirements is being addressed in Docket No. RSPA-99-6355, Enhanced Safety and Environmental Protection for Gas Transmission and Hazardous Liquid Pipelines in High Consequence Areas). A NPRM is expected to be issued by April, 2000.
Pipeline Safety: Underwater Abandoned Pipeline Facilities
(Docket No. RSPA-97-2094)
As mandated by Congress in the Pipeline Safety Act of 1992 (October 24, 1992), OPS is considering requiring operators to report on abandonment of underwater pipelines. This will require the reporting of pipelines abandoned before and after October 1992. A draft NPRM and environmental assessment has been coordinated with the OPS Regional Offices and Chief Counsel. A NPRM was published on August 30, 1999 (64 FR 47157). Public comments were received by October 29, 1999. A final rule is being prepared for publication in March, 2000.
Pipeline Safety: Recommendations to Change Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety Standards (Docket No. RSPA-97-2717)
In 1996, the NAPSR completed its review of the hazardous liquid pipeline safety regulations. It provided OPS with 28 recommendations for changes to 49 CFR Part 195 aimed at making the regulations more explicit, understandable, and enforceable. OPS is now reviewing NAPSR recommendations for inclusion in the next periodic update docket. They will seek additional information from NAPSR at the national meeting in May, 2000.
Pipeline Safety: Corrosion Control on Gas and Hazardous Liquid Pipelines
(Docket No. RSPA-97-2762)
The corrosion control regulations for gas and hazardous liquid pipelines will be revised to incorporate the latest safety practices for corrosion protection of steel pipe. Specific criteria for corrosion protection will be incorporated into the federal pipeline safety regulations, including, if appropriate the incorporation by reference of voluntary consensus standards. Comparable standards will be applied to gas and hazardous liquid pipelines. Comments were taken until June 30, 1999. These comments have been reviewed. Notices of proposed rulemaking for hazardous liquid and gas pipelines are being prepared for publication in the first half of 2000. Criteria for adequate cathodic protection will be addressed in NPRMs now being prepared.
Pipeline Safety: Rapid Isolation of Ruptured Sections of Gas Transmission Pipelines
(Docket No. RSPA-97-2879)
Research to assess the technical and economic feasibility of remote control valves (RCVs) in gas transmission systems has been completed. An evaluation was published in September 1999. A public meeting on November 4, 1999, addressed the need for a rulemaking to establish time limits for isolating ruptured sections of gas transmission pipelines. Comment period ended in December, 1999. RCVs are being considered as part of an NPRM in Docket No. RSPA-99-6355, Enhanced Safety and Environmental Protection for Gas Transmission and Hazardous Liquid Pipeline in High Consequence Areas). A NPRM is expected to be issued by April, 2000.
Pipeline Safety: Periodic Underwater Inspections (Docket No. RSPA-97-3001)
This action would require operators of natural gas and hazardous liquid pipelines to conduct periodic underwater inspections of offshore pipelines and those in navigable waterways. This action would also define what constitutes an exposed underwater pipeline and what constitutes a hazard to navigation or public safety. This could include requirements for the reburial of exposed pipelines. Under an OPS contract, Texas A&M; University has recently completed a study of the issues related to burial depth and inspection requirements for underwater pipelines. A NPRM is being drafted that will incorporate the Texas A&M; recommendation for a risk-based approach. In addition, OPS will propose standards to aid operators in defining the “virtual bottom” to establish a discrete reference for measuring burial depth. The NPRM will be published in early 2000.
Pipeline Safety: Adoption of Industry Standards for Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities
(Docket No. RSPA-97-3002)
On August 26, 1996, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) petitioned OPS to replace the current provisions of Part 193 with a reference to the NFPA 59A (1996) standard. A final rule was published on March 1, 2000. This final rule incorporates by reference an industry consensus standard for liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities subject to the pipeline safety regulations. This standard specifies siting, design, construction, equipment, and fire protection requirements that apply to new LNG facilities and to existing facilities that have been replaced, relocated, or significantly altered. All new, replaced, relocated, and significantly altered facilities are also subjected to the new operating and maintenance requirements , and all other requirements specified in this rule, as well as the unchanged portions of the regulations. The fire protection requirements also apply to existing LNG facilities. The incorporation by reference of this standard will allow industry to use the latest technology, materials, and practices while maintaining the current level of safety. This final rule can be found on the RCP Website at
http://www.your-rcp.com/downloads/Misc/FR0300.pdf
Pipeline Safety: Enforcement Procedures
(Docket No. RSPA-98-4284)
This action will revise RSPA’s pipeline safety enforcement procedures to reflect agency practices in uncontested cases where a person pays a proposed civil penalty or agrees to a proposed compliance order. The procedures will be changed to show that both responses are considered offenses when determining future civil penalty assessments. In addition, RSPA will no longer prepare a final order in cases involving these responses. These changes will streamline the enforcement process. A final rule is being prepared for publication by March, 2000.
Pipeline Safety: Pressure Testing Older Pipelines in Terminals
(Docket No. RSPA-98-4316)
Certain older pipeline in terminals and tank farms must be pressure tested before December 7, 2003. In response to a petition, RSPA is reconsidering this testing requirement in light of the risk and low operating stress of these pipelines. RSPA has stayed enforcement of the testing requirement against pipelines designed not to operate above 20 percent of SMYS. RSPA is consulting with terminal operators, API, and others. A NRPM is planned for publication by October, 2000.
Pipeline Safety: Gas Gathering Line Definition
(Docket No. RSPA-98-4868)
The existing definition of “gathering line” would be clearly defined to eliminate confusion in distinguishing these pipelines from transmission lines in rural areas. OPS intends to conform this definition to the prevailing practices in government and industry. Comments received from the electronic public meeting are now being considered in drafting a SNPRM for publication by March, 2000.
Note: API is also developing a recommended practice that will help define gathering lines.
Areas Unusually Sensitive to Environmental Damage (USAs)
(Docket No. RSP-99-5455)
The pipeline safety laws require the DOT to define areas unusually sensitive to environmental damage in the event of a hazardous liquid pipeline accident and to prescribe regulations that establish criteria for identifying each hazardous liquid pipeline facility and gathering line located in these unusually sensitive areas (USAs). RSPA has sought early public participation in this rulemaking process through 6 workshops and a series of technical meetings. This definition may help resolve the rulemakings on Emergency Flow Restricting Devices (Docket No. PS-133) and Increased Internal Inspection (Docket No. PS-141).
Although consensus was not reached on a USA definition in the workshops and technical meetings, RSPA is pilot testing the definition with API and government agencies to gain experience and provide the opportunity to consider the adequacy of the definition, its effectiveness and accessibility of environmental data. A Notice of Intent describing the pilot program was published in July 1999. A NPRM was published in December 1999 with a comment period through June 2000. A technical review of the pilot testing program will be held in April 27-28, 2000. For information contact C. Sames with OPS at 202-366-4561.
Pipeline Safety: Producer-operated Outer Continental Shelf Gas and Hazardous Liquid Pipelines that Cross into State Waters
(Docket No. RSPA-99-6132)
This proposed rule would implement a provision of the December 10, 1996, MOU between DOI and DOT regarding OCS pipelines. This rule would address producer-operated pipelines that cross into State Waters without first connecting to a transporting operator’s facility on the OCS. It is complementary to the Direct Final Rule that addressed OCS oil or gas pipelines located upstream of the points at which operating responsibility for the pipelines transfers from a producing operator to a transporting operator (62 FR 61692, November 19, 1997; and 63 FR 12659, March 16, 1998). The proposed rule would also address the procedures by which producer and transportation pipeline operators would petition for permission to operate under either DOT or DOI regulations. A NPRM is being prepared for issuance in March 2000.
Pipeline Safety: Pipeline Integrity Management in High Consequence Areas
(Docket No. RSPA-99-6355)
An October 21, 1999, notice announced a public meeting to consider the need for additional safety and environmental regulations for gas transmission lines, hazardous liquid pipelines, and distribution pipelines in high-density population areas, commercially navigable waterways, and areas unusually sensitive to environmental damage. A NPRM is being prepared to require validation/testing of the integrity of certain hazardous liquid pipelines in high consequence areas. OPS is proposing requirements for increased inspection, enhanced damage prevention, improved emergency response, and other measures to prevent and mitigate pipeline leaks and ruptures. The proposal allows an operator to choose between OPS-prescribed testing program or an operator-developed integrity management program that requires testing and compliance with industry standards. A NPRM and accompanying environmental assessment an regulatory evaluation are being prepared for publication by March 31, 2000.
Help Wanted
Know someone with regulatory expertise who is interested in full or part time work? Our recruiting coordinator would be glad to get their resume! Have them sent to linda@your-rcp.com, or FAX to 713-655-8083.
Ongoing Resources
These articles are maintained and updated as new information becomes available.
Regulatory Watch: Key Dates & Deadlines
Welcome to Regulatory Watch! In this monthly update, we’ll keep you informed on proposed rule comment periods, effective dates, and upcoming deadlines for various compliance requirements.
Proposed Rule Stage
Administrative Rulemaking Regulatory Procedures
Amendments to Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities
Breakout Tank
Oil Spill Response Plans, Accident Notifications, Inspections and Investigations and other Miscellaneous Pipeline Safety Changes
Pipeline Operational Status
Repair Criteria for Gas and Hazardous Liquid Pipelines
Safety of Carbon Dioxide and Hazardous Liquid Pipelines
Final Rule Stage
Coastal Ecological Unusually Sensitive Areas
Cost Recovery for Siting Reviews for LNG Facilities
Gas Pipeline Leak Detection and Repair
Safety of Gas Distribution Pipelines and Other Pipeline Safety Initiatives
Sprint I & II Update
To further the Administration’s deregulatory policies, PHMSA has published in today’s Federal Register twenty-eight (28) separate rulemaking actions affecting the pipeline safety regulations (PSR; Parts 190-199). Click here to access the documents.
| Rulemaking | Description | Stage | Code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pipeline Safety: Rationalize Special Permit Conditions | PHMSA proposes to amend its special permit procedures to ensure permit conditions are directly tied to the specific pipeline safety regulations being waived. | NPRM | 49 CFR Part 190 |
| Pipeline Safety: Rationalize Calculation of Regulatory Filing and Compliance Deadlines | PHMSA will clarify that regulatory filing and compliance deadlines falling on weekends or Federal holidays automatically move to the next business day. | DFR | 49 CFR Part 190 |
| Pipeline Safety: Adjust Annual Report Filing Timelines | PHMSA will amend annual reporting requirements to move the gas pipeline annual report submission deadline from March to June. | DFR | 49 CFR Part 191 |
| Pipeline Safety: Property Damage Definition for Incident Reporting | PHMSA will clarify incident reporting property damage calculations for gas pipelines and update hazardous liquid accident reporting thresholds using inflation-adjusted criteria. | DFR | 49 CFR Parts 191 & 195 |
| Pipeline Safety: Exception for In-Plant Piping Systems | PHMSA proposes to clarify that in-plant piping systems are not subject to federal pipeline safety regulations. | NPRM | 49 CFR Part 192 |
| Pipeline Safety: Codify Enforcement Discretion on Incidental Gathering Lines | PHMSA proposes to codify enforcement discretion clarifying that restrictions on the historical incidental gathering line exemption apply only to newly constructed lines. | NPRM | 49 CFR Part 192 |
| Pipeline Safety: Eliminate Burdensome Coating Assessment Deadlines | PHMSA proposes to replace prescriptive deadlines for coating damage assessments and remediation with a requirement that activities be completed before the pipeline is placed in service. | NPRM | 49 CFR Part 192 |
| Pipeline Safety: Atmospheric Corrosion Reassessment for Pipeline Replacements | PHMSA proposes to remove the 3-year reassessment interval following replacement of atmospheric corrosion defects and allow use of the standard 5-year reassessment interval. | NPRM | 49 CFR Part 192 |
| Pipeline Safety: Harmonize Class Change Pressure Test Requirements | PHMSA proposes to reduce the minimum pressure test duration following certain class location changes from 8 hours to 4 hours, aligning with existing Subpart J requirements. | NPRM | 49 CFR Part 192 |
| Pipeline Safety: Clarify MAOP Reconfirmation Testing Records | PHMSA will issue a technical correction clarifying that operators may use pre-1970s pressure test records when reconfirming MAOP under §192.624. | Final Rule | 49 CFR Part 192 |
| Pipeline Safety: Remote Sensing Technologies for ROW Patrols | PHMSA will explicitly allow right-of-way patrols to be conducted using unmanned aircraft systems, satellites, and other remote sensing technologies. | DFR | 49 CFR Parts 192 & 195 |
| Pipeline Safety: Technical Standards Updates and Amendments | PHMSA will update incorporated standards and make technical amendments in response to an industry petition for reconsideration. | Final Rule | 49 CFR Part 192 |
| Pipeline Safety Program: Update of Standards Incorporated by Reference | PHMSA issued multiple direct final rules updating incorporated industry consensus standards used throughout Parts 192 and 195, replacing outdated editions with current versions. | Multiple DFRs | 49 CFR Parts 192 & 195 |
The following is a summary of the 40 rulemakings that PHMSA published in the Federal Register on April 24, 2026. If any adverse comment is received to a DFR PHMSA must rescind the rule and repropose. Click here to access the documents.
| Rulemaking | Description | Stage | Code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pipeline Safety and Hazardous Materials Safety: Amendments to PHMSA Procedural Regulations | PHMSA proposed miscellaneous amendments to procedural regulations governing informal rulemaking for both pipeline safety and hazardous materials programs. | NPRM | 49 CFR Part 190 |
| Pipeline Safety: Interpretation Request Procedures | PHMSA amended interpretation procedures to require publication of interpretation requests on its website and provide an opportunity for public comment. | Final Rule | 49 CFR Part 190 |
| Pipeline Safety: Declaratory Order Procedures | PHMSA established formal procedures for issuing declaratory orders through a new section in Part 190. | Final Rule | 49 CFR Part 190 |
| Pipeline Safety: Consent Orders | PHMSA clarified that consent agreements may be used to resolve enforcement actions, including cases involving civil penalties. | Final Rule | 49 CFR Part 190 |
| Pipeline Safety: Adjustment to OPID Notifications for Construction | PHMSA proposed adjusting the inflation-based threshold that triggers OPID notifications for certain construction and facility modification activities. | NPRM | 49 CFR Part 191 |
| Pipeline Safety: Eliminating Limitations on Welders and Welding Operators | PHMSA proposed allowing welders qualified through non-destructive testing methods to perform compressor station welding activities currently subject to additional restrictions. | NPRM | 49 CFR Part 192 |
| Pipeline Safety: Material Properties Verification During MAOP Reconfirmation | PHMSA proposed clarifying that material testing at pressure test manifold sites is not required when traceable, verifiable, and complete material records already exist. | NPRM | 49 CFR Part 192 |
| Pipeline Safety: Electronic Retention of Part 194 Response Plans | PHMSA amended regulations to allow operators to maintain electronic copies of response plans instead of paper copies. | DFR | 49 CFR Part 194 |
| Pipeline Safety: Remote Monitoring of Rectifiers | PHMSA proposed allowing remote monitoring technologies for rectifiers used in external corrosion control programs. | NPRM | 49 CFR Part 195 |
| Pipeline Safety: Clarifying Hazardous Liquid High-Consequence Area Designations | PHMSA amended HCA guidance to clarify spill considerations in agricultural fields and reorganize threat identification guidance. | DFR | 49 CFR Part 195 |
| Pipeline Safety: Timeframe to Make Rupture-Mitigation Valves Operational | PHMSA proposed extending the deadline for placing rupture-mitigation valves into operation from 14 days to 90 days after a pipeline enters service. | NPRM | 49 CFR Part 192 |
| Pipeline Safety: Hazardous Liquid Valve Maintenance Schedule | PHMSA proposed allowing operators to implement risk-based valve maintenance schedules, subject to a maximum inspection interval of one year. | NPRM | 49 CFR Part 195 |
| Pipeline Safety: Property Damage Definition for Incident Reporting | PHMSA proposes revising property damage thresholds for reportable gas and hazardous liquid pipeline incidents and clarifying applicability to telephonic notifications. | NPRM | 49 CFR Parts 192 & 195 |
| Pipeline Safety: Remote Sensing Technologies for ROW Patrols | PHMSA proposes clarifying that unmanned aerial systems, satellites, and other remote-sensing technologies may be used to satisfy right-of-way patrol requirements. | NPRM | 49 CFR Parts 192 & 195 |
| Pipeline Safety: Adjust Annual Report and NPMS Filing Timelines | PHMSA proposes extending annual report and NPMS submission deadlines for gas pipeline and storage operators to June 15 each year. | NPRM | 49 CFR Part 191 |
| Pipeline Safety: Editorial Corrections and Clarifications | PHMSA issued multiple final rules correcting editorial errors, updating references, removing obsolete submission methods, and improving regulatory clarity. | Final Rules | Various |
| Pipeline Safety: Update of Standards Incorporated by Reference | PHMSA issued multiple direct final rules updating incorporated industry consensus standards, including NFPA, ASTM, MSS, NACE, and ASME standards. | Multiple DFRs | 49 CFR Parts 192 & 195 |
Have questions about an upcoming deadline? Please reach out to Jessica Foley for assistance!
Conference News
Pipeline Pigging and Integrity Management Conference
The 39th International Pipeline Pigging & Integrity Management Conference (PPIM) will take place at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston. The event brings together pipeline operators, engineers, and industry professionals to explore advancements in pipeline inspection, integrity management, risk assessment, and emerging technologies.…
RCP Team Attending
Heather RoarkSales & Marketing Coordinator
Jessica FoleyVice President🎤 Featured Presentations
Topic to be determined

PSI Training Schedule

| Date | Training Course | Price | Registration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17 – Nov 19, 2026 | DOT Pipeline Compliance Workshop | $2,150 | SOLD OUT |
| Feb 16 – Feb 18, 2027 | Pipeline Safety Audit Training | $2,150 | Register → |
| Feb 23 – Feb 25, 2027 | Advanced Pipeline Risk Assessment Workshop | $2,150 | Register → |
| Mar 23 – Mar 25, 2027 | DOT Pipeline Compliance Workshop | $2,150 | Register → |
WEBINAR RECORDING!
Unpacking the Key Updates in API RP 1170 & 1171, 2nd Edition
Unpacking the Key Updates in API RP 1170 & 1171, 2nd Edition
RCP and the Pipeline Safety Institute offered a free webinar exploring the 2nd Editions of API RP 1170, Design and Operation of Solution-mined Salt Caverns Used for Natural Gas Storage and API RP 1171, Functional Integrity of Natural Gas Storage in Depleted Hydrocarbon Reservoirs and Aquifer Reservoirs. Thank you to everyone who attended and participated in this informative webinar. The session recording is posted to our YouTube channel. Please watch, like, and subscribe to our channel!
You asked and we listened!
Advanced DOT Pipeline Compliance Workshop is on the calendar!
This intensive and interactive 3-day, in-person workshop is designed for those who have previously completed our DOT Pipeline Compliance Workshop and are ready to take their knowledge to the next level.
New Workshop Alert!
Prepare Your Team for Pipeline Safety Audits with Confidence!
Our 3-day Pipeline Safety Audit Workshop is tailored for professionals responsible for the safe operation of hazardous liquid and natural gas pipelines. Designed for groups of 10-15 participants, this interactive training…
On-Site Training Request
We have conducted on-site training for oil and gas companies for over 25 years and can provide customized workshops for companies with groups of five or more.
We would welcome the opportunity to discuss our services with you.
Sincerely,
![]()
W. R. (Bill) Byrd, PE
President
RCP Inc.![]()


